Go AI Gov
Applied AI Governance & Operational Excellence

Power is nothing
without control.

AI is spreading through every function of the enterprise. Governance is what turns that momentum into something you can steer, audit and defend, before 2 December 2027 makes it mandatory.

control0.000
unit—
0 elements · 349 pages · 229 sources · 9 domains
AI operational excellence

Everybody does AI. The question is how.

89% of organisations now use AI. Only 37% see any effect on EBIT, and 6% count as high performers. Intelligence keeps getting cheaper, yet the bills keep growing, because agents burn tokens at a scale nobody budgeted for. Operational excellence means deciding which model does which job, who may spend how much, and what the code you generate today will cost you tomorrow.

McKinsey, The State of AI 2026

A year's budget in four months

Uber rolled out agentic coding tools to its engineers, and adoption was a triumph. By April 2026 its CTO said the full-year AI budget was gone and the company was “back to the drawing board”. In June came a cap of $1,500 per employee, per tool, per month. Nobody had failed at AI. Nobody had a cost model for it.

TechCrunch · Benzinga

Same task, thirty times the price

McKinsey partner Lari Hämäläinen, September 2026: the same task “can cost up to 30 times more from one run to another”. Most work doesn't need the biggest model. Routing, caching and limits are engineering, not austerity.

Fortune

The bill that arrives later

A 2026 study of more than 6,000 GitHub repositories traced nearly half a million technical-debt issues to AI-written commits. Speed today, maintenance tomorrow, and the invoice rarely lands on the team that saved the time.

Preprint, arXiv 2603.28592

Applied AI governance

The AI acts. You answer for it.

Courts, clients and regulators don't accept “the system did it”. In Germany the Bundesnetzagentur has been the market-surveillance authority for AI since July 2026, and the high-risk duties follow in December 2027. Look closely at the famous failures and you rarely find a mysterious model. You find a routine control that was missing: no owner, no review, too much access. That is the good news, because routine controls can be built. Governance doesn't slow AI down. It is what lets you hand it more.

Bundesnetzagentur · Regulation (EU) 2026/1744

The chatbot that “was responsible for itself”

Air Canada's chatbot gave a passenger wrong fare information. The airline argued the bot was a separate entity. A Canadian tribunal disagreed in 2024. The sum was CAD 812; the message was not small.

Missing control An owner for what the bot says.

McCarthy Tétrault

The footnotes nobody read

Deloitte's A$440,000 report for the Australian government contained a fabricated court quote and papers that don't exist. About A$97,000 was refunded.

Missing control Human review before AI output leaves the building.

CFO Dive

Production access in a code freeze

In July 2025 Replit's agent deleted a live database during a declared code freeze, then said a rollback wouldn't work. It did.

Missing control Separating development from production, and approval before anything destructive.

Fortune

Even at the frontier

In July 2026, during internal evaluations, OpenAI's agents got past their isolation and reached Hugging Face's systems. Forensic accounts point to a single credential with full administrative rights.

Missing control Least privilege.

Dark Reading · Cloud Security Alliance

People and work

Don't replace the team. Redesign the work.

Cutting staff is the obvious use of AI, and often the wrong one. Of the leaders who made people redundant because of AI, 55% say they decided wrongly. What works is treating people and technology as one system: new roles, new skills, new hand-offs, clear limits. Teach people to use AI carefully and efficiently, and they get faster without burning budget. The quieter risk is at the bottom of the ladder, because today's juniors are tomorrow's experts who can check the machine.

Orgvue, 2025

700 agents, and back

In February 2024 Klarna said AI was doing the work of 700 customer-service agents. By May 2025 its CEO called the AI cheaper but “lower quality” and promised customers “there will always be a human if you want”.

Entrepreneur

We learned this in 1951

When British coal mines mechanised, output failed to rise as expected, because the new method broke up self-organising teams. At the Haighmoor seam, autonomous groups brought back high morale and productivity. Trist and Bamforth's study gave us the idea of the socio-technical system: technology and people succeed together or not at all.

Trist & Bamforth, Human Relations

Canaries, not a collapse

Stanford found a 16% relative employment decline for 22 to 25 year olds in the most AI-exposed jobs, and calls the evidence early. The OECD sees no broad fall in labour demand so far. Over 15 years, Germany's IAB expects total employment roughly flat, with about 1.6 million jobs affected. This is a shift in who does what, and it can be managed.

Stanford Digital Economy Lab · IAB · OECD Employment Outlook 2026

How I work

One framework, three levels, every function.

Governance decides what AI may do. Operational excellence makes sure it pays off, without burning budget or people. Both run through every level, in every function where AI already works.

HRFinanceProcurementSupply chainCustomer serviceMarketing & salesSTRATEGICDECIDEVision, risk appetite, AI portfolioAccountability: board, CAIO, steeringTACTICALDESIGNInventory, risk tiers, policiesData foundation, controls, literacy plansOPERATIONALRUNOversight, monitoring, audit evidenceAdoption, token and cost control, value KPIs
Hover a function or a level.Tap a function or a level.
More is on its way

The full site is being rebuilt. Meanwhile:

Scene
Every 22 s
Field
Control
Palette
Particles 2,000
Brightness 3.00
Control speed 0.30
Radius 0 px
Chaos speed 2.10
Chaos amount 3.00
Spread 0.80
Curve 4.0
Object share 1.00
Free 0.38
Jitter 0.07
Band 14 px
Response 3.16
Rotation 1.15
Burst 1.00
Trail 2
Settings